krapp

>There is a huge difference between being on the wrong side of an issue and choosing not to take sides

Democrats aren't choosing not to take sides, they're choosing to take the anti-trans side because they feel (likely correctly) that it holds more political currency in the current right-wing authoritarian climate.

>That doesn't mean someone should be against making trans a protected class for employment, et cetera purposes.

But that's just the thing - they will turn against that for the same reason, naked political opportunism. Republicans seem to actually care about principles, odious as those principles sometimes are, whereas the Democrats are constantly trying to curry favor with centrists and conservatives because they're afraid to be labelled "leftist."

None of them turn into a little robot. Lame.

Finding interest or enjoyment in your work is a privilege most people don't have. If you can't afford to leave just suck it up and deal with it. Find enjoyment elsewhere.

I don't think that LLMs mirror human cognition or "sanity" as much as people want to believe. We are not constantly hallucinating in any way that applies to the term as commonly understood relative to LLMs or to humans. Mistakes, minor psychological changes and emotions aren't equivalent to LLM hallucinations or human psychosis. The relationship is superficial due to both humans and LLMs using natural language. But humans understand that language and its context, whereas LLMs do not.

The narrative exists to justify deskilling and replacing human expertise with LLMs on the premise that LLMs are at worse human equivalent and at best human superior but the hyperbole employed to make the false equivalence sometimes borders on the absurd and occult.

>It wouldn't surprise me if a systematic approach to solve these problems with LLMs could be applied to human/hybrid teams.

What you're describing aren't "problems" that need to be "solved" in human beings. They are problems when they persist in software, but we already had software that didn't have these problems.

This is a state of being that we chose because we decided profit superseded all other concerns.

Trans people want to exist without being harassed, assaulted or killed, without being classified as degenerates by the government. They're in the same social space that gay people were 40 years ago.

You aren't talking about compromise on fiscal policy, you're talking about compromise on basic human rights and decency. Accepting transphobia from the Democratic party just means the transphobes get everything they want.

Criticism of Sam Altman is bound to be flagged.

Sorry... our high-T Spartan chad warfighters don't do computers, that's nerd shit.

I use "I check my threads page sometimes and comments that aren't on the first page cease to exist as far as I'm concerned."

Every celebrity death thread is more or less the same in that regard. Discussion is far more about nostalgia for media and characters than the actual person.

Skill issue. Picard managed it with Beverly Crusher, Vash and Q.

No they don't. Any human who hallucinated as much as an LLM does would be committed.

Dang has never decided to put it up for an actor or any mainstream celebrity.

COVID policies, including masking, started under Trump not Biden. Trump rather infamously refused to wear a mask because he thought it made him look weak in front of the press.

>Why would you then trust them with a downvote or flagging button?

Because at least a downvote is silent. Without a downvote that energy just bleeds into more argumentative and off-topic discussion.

The problem is people complaining about downvotes. People need to just accept them as the cost of doing business here and move on. Complaining is only going to get you downvoted more.

That would be socialism and socialism is bad.