They created a company that people willingly buy over $1 billion of product from every year. Why shouldn’t creating that much value in the world result in the owners collectively benefiting? If that happens to be a million different people each having a $1000 stake or 1 family having a $1B stake, I don’t have a problem thinking that either is a valid outcome.
IMO, we should look at the value created and celebrate that rather than jealously fret over the concentration of the number of people who own it.
To be clear: I think what they did is admirable on both the building and the recent transaction. I respect them greatly for both parts.
IMO, we should look at the value created and celebrate that rather than jealously fret over the concentration of the number of people who own it.
To be clear: I think what they did is admirable on both the building and the recent transaction. I respect them greatly for both parts.