But the point is about the quality of the product, not the financial size or userbase of the company. Isn't it possible to have the (impressive) attribute of size while simultaneously making a bad product?
What about Myspace? $800m in revenue from 115m users. The classic 'good product' story, right?
What about Myspace? $800m in revenue from 115m users. The classic 'good product' story, right?