Recent submissions

Comment · 8 days ago
Personal experience: they get fifty bodies on a two-person job. The work is fine, but not good enough to learn from. Which actually makes sense if you think of their company as a machine that can adapt to whatever problem.
Comment · 1 month ago
But that was the single hardest claim in the model register!
Comment · 1 month ago
The mini accounted for 3% of sales. Personally I’m a believer, and a buyer, but 3% isn’t a good number.
Comment · 2 months ago
I really love this. It’s comprehensive, it consolidates the data to the point where the argument effectively ‘makes itself’, and the way it’s presented respects the reader’s time. It also makes for an interesting challenge (for me at least) to try to characterise the subject matter of a language problem so narrowly.

No ream of slides. No narrative. Just a lovely big painful conclusion.

Comment · 1 year ago
With only a passing knowledge of the field, I'm aware that the standard of monopolistic effect varies between the EU and US (neither specifically uses financial size as the standard). In the EU it's about whether there is sufficient competition in the market, whereas in the US it's about whether the price is sufficiently competitive.
Comment · 1 year ago
He has such a talent for brevity: "You know a judge is pissed when she busts out the bold italics."
Comment · 1 year ago
For me (IANAL), reading the judgment was initially shocking primarily for its facts and tone, rather than having any understanding of the legal consequences. I initially skipped over the phrase 'contempt of court' because the phrase seems so familiar from TV. But on reflection, it's the most consequential part of the document because, as you say, it has actual consequences for the people involved.
Comment · 2 years ago
Cast iron, presumably.
Comment · 2 years ago
+1. I read this a few weeks back and it really stuck with me.
Comment · 2 years ago
The article is saying ‘kinda’. The process works in lab conditions with highly purified ore, but produces an equivalent amount of chlorine gas and iron.
Comment · 3 years ago
I think there's a reasonable case to be made that consoles (and the vertically integrated business structure that they represent) inherently encourage more diverse kinds of games development while also attracting new buyers. Their business practices aren't ideal, granted. But it's not entirely clear to me that a walled garden constitutes a true monopoly. That is to say that the console makers aren't using their control over their own systems to force their way into adjacent, unrelated markets.

Also, the standard for what constitutes anti-competitive behaviour is different in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. The US uses higher pricing as the prime signal, whereas the EU uses a lack of viable competitiors.

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 3 years ago
Book hack: some lengthy autobiographies have an ‘about the author’ section on the inside cover.
Comment · 3 years ago
I would think that software engineering is the exception that proves the rule: people with domain knowledge are highly motivated to share what they know, ask questions, consolidate knowledge, and refine processes using the Internet.

Working in another field (public services might be a good example) it’s often not possible to test out hypothetical solutions, or find relevant expertise, or to even discover that whole areas of knowledge actually exist. In that context, relevant qualifications have a little more weight.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton