> pro-spending / pro-austerity
NHS spending 2009/2010: £124.1 billion
NHS spending 2019/2020: £148.9 billion
> What exactly is the point you are trying to make?
You don't have a clue about what's actually going on in reality. That was the point. Thanks for proving it.
> Pouring money into "diversity" is certainly nothing to do with it
It must be nice to be able to spend the same money twice. Please let us know how exactly to accomplish this feat.
> Overall resilience of the NHS
People dying right now waiting for ambulances. People dying in spates of cancer and heart disease due to delayed screening or missed treatments[1]. "the NHS is so resilient".
> It's not difficult to draw a straight line from one to the other.
So your plan is to put all your eggs into one basket (i.e. state-run health care) and then cross your fingers that no bad politicians (ehm conservatives) ever get into power. That sounds like a very well thought out and forward looking plan.
[1] https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/we-re-at-pandemic-levels...
NHS spending 2009/2010: £124.1 billion
NHS spending 2019/2020: £148.9 billion
> What exactly is the point you are trying to make?
You don't have a clue about what's actually going on in reality. That was the point. Thanks for proving it.
> Pouring money into "diversity" is certainly nothing to do with it
It must be nice to be able to spend the same money twice. Please let us know how exactly to accomplish this feat.
> Overall resilience of the NHS
People dying right now waiting for ambulances. People dying in spates of cancer and heart disease due to delayed screening or missed treatments[1]. "the NHS is so resilient".
> It's not difficult to draw a straight line from one to the other.
So your plan is to put all your eggs into one basket (i.e. state-run health care) and then cross your fingers that no bad politicians (ehm conservatives) ever get into power. That sounds like a very well thought out and forward looking plan.
[1] https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/we-re-at-pandemic-levels...