On the "Problems / Solutions" slide: "save ... up to 100% off retail" says absolutely nothing, except perhaps that the author doesn't know how percents work. "save ... up to 100%" means "save somewhere between nothing and everything".
On the graph in the "Customer Acquisition" slide, the "reduce customer acquisition cost through SEO" point implies a lower cost to acquire a customer, not a higher long-term value per customer.
The "Traction" slide provides four useful figures, attached to giant meaningless arrows made of up-and-to-the-rightium.
This pitch still sits on a webpage, so why don't the logos on the "Press Coverage" slide link to the actual coverage?
On the "Problems / Solutions" slide: "save ... up to 100% off retail" says absolutely nothing, except perhaps that the author doesn't know how percents work. "save ... up to 100%" means "save somewhere between nothing and everything".
On the graph in the "Customer Acquisition" slide, the "reduce customer acquisition cost through SEO" point implies a lower cost to acquire a customer, not a higher long-term value per customer.
The "Traction" slide provides four useful figures, attached to giant meaningless arrows made of up-and-to-the-rightium.
This pitch still sits on a webpage, so why don't the logos on the "Press Coverage" slide link to the actual coverage?