The logical construction of this piece is poorly formulated.
The title is “why does x happen”.
The content is:
I believe foo.
Evidence behind why author believes foo.
Here is an arbitrary list of 6 behavioral responses to foo: [a b c d e x].
X happens which is a bad thing.
There is no critical analysis or evidence substantiating the 6 responses, nor how/why response x happens. In other words, there’s no intellectual rigor behind the title’s claim, nor do I have any inclination to believe the author’s claim as true after reading it.
The title is “why does x happen”.
The content is:
I believe foo. Evidence behind why author believes foo.
Here is an arbitrary list of 6 behavioral responses to foo: [a b c d e x]. X happens which is a bad thing.
There is no critical analysis or evidence substantiating the 6 responses, nor how/why response x happens. In other words, there’s no intellectual rigor behind the title’s claim, nor do I have any inclination to believe the author’s claim as true after reading it.