I agree, Zoom seemed willing to work with the ex-employee.
Unfortunately people often overlook that they are an ambassador for the company they work for. Their employer will usually not tolerate aggravating a (potential) revenue-generating relationship with a third party by any employee.
I believe Zoom did the right thing here, but I’m curious what CA law says.
Unfortunately people often overlook that they are an ambassador for the company they work for. Their employer will usually not tolerate aggravating a (potential) revenue-generating relationship with a third party by any employee.
I believe Zoom did the right thing here, but I’m curious what CA law says.