If it catches ANY bugs it is objectively better than no PR/code-review from a bug standpoint. Unless you're arguing that pr/code-review creates more bugs than it solves?
Again, I think the question is value. Is a dev's time best used in code-review vs. something else? It's almost certainly the case that time is better spent elsewhere depending on the develop and needs or the organization.
Again, I think the question is value. Is a dev's time best used in code-review vs. something else? It's almost certainly the case that time is better spent elsewhere depending on the develop and needs or the organization.