The thing they estimate is reduction of deer collisions, according to the abstract. So that’s a rather limited scope in comparison to the title.
What surprises me more (I guess I’m a bit jaded), is that the title suggests that nature is there to be economically exploited. Does a species run up a loss? Extinction is its fate.
What surprises me more (I guess I’m a bit jaded), is that the title suggests that nature is there to be economically exploited. Does a species run up a loss? Extinction is its fate.