> If we wanted to ignore research, why would we create an industry-leading research program to understand these important issues in the first place?
> If we wanted to hide our results, why would we have established an industry-leading standard for transparency and reporting on what we're doing?
This is HILARIOUSLY out of touch with reality.
You don't call someone a whistleblower if the reports they leaked were TRANSPARENT and PUBLIC.
Seriously what is wrong with this man? Does he have any clue whatsoever what impact that his majority control over Facebook has over the behavior of the world?
> If we wanted to hide our results, why would we have established an industry-leading standard for transparency and reporting on what we're doing?
This is HILARIOUSLY out of touch with reality.
You don't call someone a whistleblower if the reports they leaked were TRANSPARENT and PUBLIC.
Seriously what is wrong with this man? Does he have any clue whatsoever what impact that his majority control over Facebook has over the behavior of the world?