Comment

Comment by ItsMonkk

So I've been trying to work this out. Previously I understood the idea "The passives are simply the average of the actives". So even if you had 99% passive, so long as the actives were doing their homework the system would work, but as you said you need to watch for exploits.

But then I had the question: When the world has gone passive, who is left as an active investor?

1. Wallstreetbets users who do poorly on average, and they are small

2. Highly skilled Hedgefunds like Medallion who do great on average, but they are small

3. ... the company using debt to buyback its own shares

So the key behind this entire stock market is that its a beauty contest where you need to make guesses as to what everyone else will do. But as active investors shrink with the increase in passive, what we are allowing happen is that the companies who use debt to buyback their shares are whats driving the market. Every dollar they spend on their stock is then magnified 100x by the big passive funds, and both 1 & 2 have no agency other than to try to get swept up in the winds.

I have not yet done the intensive research to understand how large 3 can effect a stock, does anyone here have any idea if this will be a problem, and if we are already seeing signs that this is happening already?

parent ItsMonkk 5 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton