Submitted title was "IMF says credit score should incorporate browsing history". That was egregious editorializing. Submitters: please don't do that!
Cherry-picking the most sensational detail and making that the title is definitely not ok, and fabricating something the article doesn't say is right out! https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
When a title buries the lede in favor of bland corporate rhetoric, it's fine to replace it, but you should replace it with something accurate and neutral, using representative language from the article itself. I've taken a crack at that above. If anyone can suggest a better title by these criteria, we can change it again.
When a title buries the lede in favor of bland corporate rhetoric, it's fine to replace it, but you should replace it with something accurate and neutral, using representative language from the article itself. I've taken a crack at that above. If anyone can suggest a better title by these criteria, we can change it again.