> Wild wolves are social but not particularly hierarchichal.
This is simply a lie. All wolf packs are strictly hierarchical. Meaning there is no wolf pack without a hierarchy.
> A typical wolf pack is formed of a couple and their offsprings.
Which forms a hierarchy.
> The idea that wolf pack have complex fixed hierarchical structure
Who said they had a "complex" "fixed" hierarchical structure? It's rather simple and obvious.
> Wolves are however both social and used to complex interactions involving social dominance.
"complex", "social dominance". Which is it? You say they don't have complex hierarchy and then claim complex interactions involving social dominance. What do you think social dominance exists to create?
Wolf packs have hierarchy like human families have hierarchy.
This is simply a lie. All wolf packs are strictly hierarchical. Meaning there is no wolf pack without a hierarchy.
> A typical wolf pack is formed of a couple and their offsprings.
Which forms a hierarchy.
> The idea that wolf pack have complex fixed hierarchical structure
Who said they had a "complex" "fixed" hierarchical structure? It's rather simple and obvious.
> Wolves are however both social and used to complex interactions involving social dominance.
"complex", "social dominance". Which is it? You say they don't have complex hierarchy and then claim complex interactions involving social dominance. What do you think social dominance exists to create?
Wolf packs have hierarchy like human families have hierarchy.