> Surely Virginia Woolf’s analysis applies here: in a sexist society, the arbiters of taste simply can’t help thinking that books dealing with war are more important than a book that ‘deals with the feelings of women in a drawing room’.
Am I missing something here? Books about war are also more important than books about facial hair grooming. Still sexist? I don't get it.
Am I missing something here? Books about war are also more important than books about facial hair grooming. Still sexist? I don't get it.