Konrad Hinsen is an expert in molecular bioinformatics and also has significantly contributed to Numerical Python, for example, and has extensively published around the topic of reproducible science and algorithms - see his blog.
The fact that he might favor different solutions from you does not mean that he is pushing some kind of hidden agenda.
If you think that Common Workflow Language is a better solution, you are free to explain in a blog why you think this.
Are you saying that the reproductive challenge poses a difficulty to Common Workflow Language? If this is so, would that not rather support Hinsen's point - without implying that what he suggests is already a perfect solution?
The fact that he might favor different solutions from you does not mean that he is pushing some kind of hidden agenda.
If you think that Common Workflow Language is a better solution, you are free to explain in a blog why you think this.
Are you saying that the reproductive challenge poses a difficulty to Common Workflow Language? If this is so, would that not rather support Hinsen's point - without implying that what he suggests is already a perfect solution?