Blanket implies "all". Are the OP's following statements incorrect?:
"no evidence of Human-to-human spread" when they had evidence, "no evidence of asymptomatic spread" when we all had evidence, "no evidence of aerosol spread" when there was evidence in public view
Taiwan warned the WHO with respect to human-to-human transmission. Is this in dispute?
Blanket implies "all". Are the OP's following statements incorrect?:
"no evidence of Human-to-human spread" when they had evidence, "no evidence of asymptomatic spread" when we all had evidence, "no evidence of aerosol spread" when there was evidence in public view
Taiwan warned the WHO with respect to human-to-human transmission. Is this in dispute?
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20200412_01/
>not the conversation we have in Hacker News comments.
These are precisely the sorts of conversations people should be having.