Comment

Comment by wool_gather

Ioannidis had [a similar opinion article][0] published last week.

It's worth reading [the rebuttal that followed][1] (as long as we're doing credentials: "Marc Lipsitch, D.Phil., is professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and director of Harvard’s Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics."):

It agrees that the basic lack of good information is a failing and also certainly creates risk. But we have seen at least twice now the outcomes of doing nothing or almost nothing:

> First, the number of severe cases — the product of these two unknowns — becomes fearsome in country after country if the infection is allowed to spread.

> So acting before the crisis hits — as was done in some Chinese cities outside Wuhan, and in some of the small towns in Northern Italy — is essential to prevent a health system overload.

There are clearly no truly good choices available right now.

---

[0]:https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-a...

[1]:https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/18/we-know-enough-now-to-ac...

parent wool_gather 6 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton