I find the fact that Wikipedia deletes content to be almost offensive, especially when there are so many 'stubs' and other one-paragraph articles all over the site. It's supposed to be a free encyclopedia that catalogs the world's information.
If there is a serious issue with an article, then fine, quarantine it or somehow set it aside. But to remove a well-written, well-cited and interesting article for dubious reasons really seems unnecessary. Maybe if they had incorporated it into the regular article on GiTS, it would make sense. But there is zero mention of the philosophical content:
If there is a serious issue with an article, then fine, quarantine it or somehow set it aside. But to remove a well-written, well-cited and interesting article for dubious reasons really seems unnecessary. Maybe if they had incorporated it into the regular article on GiTS, it would make sense. But there is zero mention of the philosophical content:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Shell