Archive.org modifies the memories it stores. But I don't find much irony in the article being deleted. It seems more appropriate as part of a larger article on Ghost in the Shell. It's an aspect of an imaginary world not something that stands alone in the context of general shared experience. An accurate understanding requires boiling all the oceans of Ghost in the Shell. As a standalone, it's more like an academic paper.
Incidentally, to the degree there's irony here, archive.org's modification of the content seems more relevant than it's deletion. Forgotten isn't wrong, it's just forgotten.
Incidentally, to the degree there's irony here, archive.org's modification of the content seems more relevant than it's deletion. Forgotten isn't wrong, it's just forgotten.