That's the same kind of reasoning that sent a mom of whose babies died to prison for decades. (I can't remember her name so can't link, sorry - it's a well known story of a mother getting convicted for double child murder because a doctor did some shitty statistics in court).
Sure, the chance is high. But if there is no conclusive evidence, then there's no conclusive evidence.
That might be enough for angry Twitter mobs, but I sure hope that it's not enough for court.
Sure, the chance is high. But if there is no conclusive evidence, then there's no conclusive evidence.
That might be enough for angry Twitter mobs, but I sure hope that it's not enough for court.