I'm having trouble understanding what rule he broke. He had some content with ads on it chosen by Google's algorithms. People clicked those ads, then didn't buy anything from the advertiser. How is that his fault?
I don't mean this as a rhetorical question. I honestly want to know how someone with an ad-supported site can avoid such a situation.
Edit: elsewhere in the comments, I see that he was telling his viewers that clicking the ads gets him money. I agree, that's not fair to the advertisers.
I don't mean this as a rhetorical question. I honestly want to know how someone with an ad-supported site can avoid such a situation.
Edit: elsewhere in the comments, I see that he was telling his viewers that clicking the ads gets him money. I agree, that's not fair to the advertisers.