> the world’s most valuable company, led by its richest man
AAPL ($801B) reclaimed this mantle recently; AMZN ($775B) is back to #2.
EDIT: why the downvotes? I'm not saying the sentiment is wrong, but it doesn't look good for a news organization to get something like this wrong, especially when they are owned by the CEO of the company that they are misreporting on. It also tends to corroborate the pro-Amazon reporting bias that others have expressed here.
AAPL ($801B) reclaimed this mantle recently; AMZN ($775B) is back to #2.
EDIT: why the downvotes? I'm not saying the sentiment is wrong, but it doesn't look good for a news organization to get something like this wrong, especially when they are owned by the CEO of the company that they are misreporting on. It also tends to corroborate the pro-Amazon reporting bias that others have expressed here.