What is your qualification for "protecting" privacy? Clearly Signal has improved privacy compared to other messaging platforms as has been proven by subpoenas by law enforcement. That, in my mind, qualifies as privacy protection over many other messaging solutions that have not been proven or failed in that arena.
Claiming Signal doesn't protect privacy because: phone numbers is an opinion given you haven't qualified your argument.
Finally their goal is not predicated on what you claim just because you claim it. You're effectively creating a false argument so you can justify your position.
Claiming Signal doesn't protect privacy because: phone numbers is an opinion given you haven't qualified your argument.
Finally their goal is not predicated on what you claim just because you claim it. You're effectively creating a false argument so you can justify your position.