>What exactly is the big deal with having just static content?
I don't read romance novels, so publishers shouldn't be allowed to print them.
The problem is that your personal opinion on the legitimate utility of javascript doesn't have any value beyond your own browser, and the entire rest of the world has decided that a purely static web is not what it wants.
>What exactly is the big deal with having just static content?
I don't read romance novels, so publishers shouldn't be allowed to print them.
The problem is that your personal opinion on the legitimate utility of javascript doesn't have any value beyond your own browser, and the entire rest of the world has decided that a purely static web is not what it wants.