Comment

Comment by NTDF9

Here's my gripe with this interview process. It encourages engineers to spend months and years into learning and remembering optimal solutions to textbook problems.

A REAL engineer would spend the same time doing something productive....things like:

- Writing a sql optimization for their current company that saves resources

- Creating shared memory interfaces for faster processing of logs

- Modifying filesystems or kernel to create their own log processing

- Modifying JVM to optimize critical code

- Rewriting parts of a server to set up security alerts

- Fast encryption and decryption of in-memory cache records

- Writing an interpreter for faster generation of low level code for high speed processing

- And on and on

My point is, today's interview process treats engineers with such complicated experience as shit because they spent time working on complex projects and couldn't memorize these questions. But then these same companies will hire some mediocre engineer who cannot think out of the box but is an expert at memorization.

Said mediocre engineers then hire other mediocre engineers using the same process, because these mediocre engineers do not even have the ability to grasp what kind of engineering would lead to above points.

To top it off, these same mediocre engineers sweep this problem under the rug claiming they are trying to reduce false negatives. Lol!

Sad state of the industry!

parent NTDF9 9 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton