> If they didn't have a stack of 100,000 resumes, they would throw this ridiculous process out the window in a heartbeat and actually interview people for the position.
Absolutely.
If they had far fewer resumes then they'd be much less willing to pass on potentially good hires, and more willing to risk bad hires. You make it sound like we're disagreeing, but this is 100% consistent with what I said.
Absolutely.
If they had far fewer resumes then they'd be much less willing to pass on potentially good hires, and more willing to risk bad hires. You make it sound like we're disagreeing, but this is 100% consistent with what I said.