zwerdlds

"For 'whom' they voted."

That works too. I've done both and I currently use Just because it collects the entrypoints to the project into a single file. This can provide an advantage where there's a bit of interdependence across your entrypoints.

E.g: You have a docker container, you might be `run`ning it, `exec`ing it etc. from the same compose-file. So Just gives you the ability to link those shared commands within the same file. Once the entrypoints get too numerous you can either break them into scripts (I do this partially depending on the level of behavioral complexity in the script) or partition your justfiles and import them into a single master.

But... Your comment was an anecdote too?

Just make sure to keep an eye on your monthly statement. AT&T will arbitrarily decide that you should upgrade your plan and charge you more for it - despite your previous plan being perfectly within your usage.

Agreed. At what price do you think cruises internalize the externalized costs?

How do you even TRUST the leadership and that point?

I've been in this situation before, and the ideas in my head are basically paranoia. How do I trust that my manager isn't going to throw me under the bus in the next project? How would I EVEN KNOW?

Will Cruise be taking centralized responsibility for the issues here? Will the person who caused the initial accident be held responsible?

I think it's very worthwhile to think of the overall improvements to safety while still acknowledging the arbitrage a corporation brings.

> Apple have never bet such a huge chunk of their spending on a single tech that has been so resoundingly mocked.

I guess the 90's don't count anymore.

I see that Steve Klabnik an Corey Haines apologized on their blogs, and you're right that I was wrong there. The reason I wrote that was in the article it says "I queried some tweeters for more information on why exactly it was so bothersome. I didn’t get apologies from these tweeters."

I do want to point out that if you complain about someone in a medium, it's reasonable to expect the apology or explanation there. If someone is a jerk in front of other people to you, they should clarify their behavior in front of everyone, not just a direct, personal apology.

This is kind of my point - I'm not a neurologist or social scientist, but, in my opinion, we humans don't seem well equipped to deal with the group sizes the internet makes available. I think it's totally valid to point out that the problem here isn't really the individual behavior per-se, it's the behavior in the context of 10k others. In the blink of an eye, we've made it possible for virtually everyone to reach an enormous amount of people, so easily, and with so little oversight, that it falls on those people to take responsibility for engaging with the platform in the first place.

And yet no thought is given to broadcasting a thought to thousands or millions of people simultaneously. You're right, by the way, nobody should be put on trial for minor transgressions like this, but in a humane world, they wouldn't happen either.

also, FTA, it appears they did ask for an apology, which they apparently didn't get. Another thing interactions on the internet make very hard, is that owning your transgressions when you're wrong has very little utility as the other person is easy to objectify.

If it's reasonable for a 12yo to be able to play in a for-money tourney, then I don't think it's unreasonable to think they should know the difference between right and wrong.

Not being too familiar with the underlying mechanics, I'm curious to know- How much will this improve the performance?

>Basic Qualifications > • PhD degree in a field related to Image Analysis, or equivalent work experience

I think I know why.