yubblegum
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
As for today, we are discussing distinct means of producing the same thing: software. Painting remains because photography was at most displacing a subset of the field. Generative AI writing software may be displacing an entire profession.
Agents fail randomly. One day a stellar dev and next a bs artist.
So this idea that LLM hallucination is not unlike human failings is without merit.
And that "loser" comment. Looking at this Andy's mug on google image search and enjoying a mild lol moment. Really, Andy, take a good look in the mirror.
Wtf does that mean.
US is doing a slow kill since the current regime in US wants to bring to a conclusion certain matters and it is running against a clock. The main goal is to get the Arabs to make peace with Israel and sign that "Abraham's Accord". Weakening EU and also putting the fear of 'Chaos' in the Chinese who are, assuredly, dependent on a functioning geopolitical order, even if 'unfair' or 'unjust', as long as it works, and it hums, since China needs that to survive.
So right now, Russia is getting all the benefits (which is why Putin gaslighted the Iranians the other day congratulating them for their stand against the USA) and US is busy busy establishing the American Hemisphere, so basically for US, if shit is breaking, that is a feature not a bug.
Yes, I know. Some "professor" and some "ex" something are saying IRI is winning. And "US has never won a war since WW2". Yet the chronic 'loser' US is somehow the superpower hegemon. Not bad for a country that hasn't won a single war for 6+ decades. Hmm.
So pay attention to the sound track and adjust your "suspension of disbelief" accordingly.
This vote is critical.
"AI" tech is actually a perfect specimen here: this could be a genuinely positive net for Humanity if only it wasn't controlled by the sort of scumbags that are only motivated by "profit".
Entire institutions and organizations in humanity are based on this feature of human beings.
A heuristic software agent that will respond in a spectrum of possible ways and past performance is no guarantee of future performance. It is no way reassuring that your agent has 'never done x' since if 'x is in the space of possible responses' it can certainly do 'x'.