yourduskquibble
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
Stop using their user-hostile service? They need my eyeballs in order to sell me to advertisers. If they are creating features that turn users away, their bottom line may be impacted enough that they reevaluate their user-hostile business practices.
TANSTAAFL
How would you determine if the new user interface provided (or not) any [new or perceived] level of privacy?
gorhill's (developer of uBO) explanation from[1] below:
> uBO-Extra is needed to deal with IL stuff because the IL inline script appears at the top of the served HTML page -- before any other secondary resource-pulling tag. uBO-Extra injects its content script declaratively, i.e. on every page, hence it will always run before IL stuff.
The root cause of why it is needed is because of a bug with web socket implementation in chrome.[2]
Additional info on why both are needed (& why for chrome but not firefox) in some reddit threads.[3][4][5]
[1] https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/227#issuecomm...
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=487422
[3] https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/83quub/ublock...
[4] https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/7mfkv1/ublock...
[5] https://old.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/a9trz2/ublock_origi...
[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/wiki/Sites-on-which-uBO...
You'll leave an orphaned article info table row with this approach but you can hide the article row itself with uBlock Origin procedural filters[1].
Add the following to 'My Filters':
news.ycombinator.com##table tr tr:has([href*="nytimes.com"])
[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Procedural-cosmetic-f...
This seems incorrect. They are more common than you think, especially in neighborhoods built within the last 30-40 years.
> I love the form factor, and I just ordered the "new" Airpods, because I am hoping the battery life has improved - the old ones are basically a disposable item after the first year, from my experience.
The OP complained about battery life and the $200 "disposable" headphones he bought a year ago, but happily bought the next iteration, hence my comment.
Fool me once...