yogsototh

I myself learned programming with logo, at my school when I was 8 or 10. And it was a delight, I am so grateful it existed.

But quite surprisingly, when later during my Ph.D. part of my time was dedicated to give exercises to students. And we used logo instead of the more usual programming languages. And I think it really helped them to really internalise programming a lot better. Typically, the latest exercices introduced recursion which is immediately visible as fractals.

    HIDETURTLE
    
    PENUP
    SETXY -200 0
    RIGHT 90
    PENDOWN
    
    to dragon :degree :size
        setpensize 1
        if :size>5  [setpensize 2]
        if :size>10 [setpensize 3]
        if :size>20 [setpensize 4]
        if :size>40 [setpensize 5]
        ifelse :degree=0 [
            fd :size
        ][
            left  45 dragon (:degree-1) (size/4)
            right 90 dragon (:degree-1) (size/2)
            left  90 dragon (:degree-1) (size/4)
            right 45
        ]
    end
    
    dragon 6 3000

if you want to give a try :)

Personally this is a hidden trick I use.

Ask AI to build something. By default it will use python. Sometimes js or typescript.

Ask then to do the same thing in Clojure. The result is generally an order of magnitude better. Shorter, easier to read for both humans and llm. Easier to adapt to changes.

I remember a documentary about learning things to kids, and in order to optimise learning efficiency the optimal ratio for difficult questions should be 1/4. So the children continue to feel good about themselves, while still improving.

So I guess this ratio about easy vs difficult question should be a parameter in such spaced repetition algorithms.

I remember there were data loss, but my account appears to have been recovered. You may try to login again, and with luck, like me you will get back your history.

I host a forgejo instance and I feel it is great to embrace the distributed nature of git.

But be aware if you intend to host it you will need to protect it from recent AI web scrapers. I use anubis but there are other alternatives.

I think this already exists and there are lot of them. Regarding stealth AI interview, there are many existing products.

Mainly they listen to the interview, and write down answers in an overlay for you to repeat. They ace leet code, etc...

I guess this is already pretty close.

"Purely Functional Programming", I guess mostly Haskell/Purescript.

So this only really mean:

Purely Functional Programming by default.

In most programming languages you can write

"hello " + readLine()

And this would intermix pure function (string concatenation) and impure effect (asking the user to write some text). And this would work perfectly.

By doing so, the order of evaluation becomes essential.

With a pure functional programming (by default).

you must explicitely separate the part of your program doing I/O and the part of your program doing only pure computation. And this is enforced using a type system focusing on I/O. Thus the difference between Haskell default `IO` and OCamL that does not need it for example.

in Haskell you are forced by the type system to write something like:

    do 
      name <- getLine
      let s = "Hello " <> name <> "!"
      putStrLn s

you cannot mix the `getLine` directly in the middle of the concatenation operation.

But while this is a very different style of programming, I/O are just more explicit, and they "cost" more, because writing code with I/O is not as elegant, and easy to manipulate than pure code. Thus it naturally induce a way of coding that try to really makes you conscious about the part of your program that need IO and the part that you could do with only pure function.

In practice, ... yep, you endup working in a "Specific to your application domain" Monad that looks a lot like the IO Monad, but will most often contains IO.

Another option is to use a free monad for your entire program that makes you able to write in your own domain language and control its evaluation (either using IO or another system that simulates IO but is not really IO, typically for testing purpose).

For being an Haskell and Clojure dev. Data manipulation in Clojure requires a mind shift coming from Haskell. But it feels a lot more straightforward in Clojure. Even if `lens` is incredible. This is like Haskell lenses was were included in the core language if you want. Of course, not type-safe. This is just that, solving problems in Haskell or in Clojure does not really require the same approach. But both ways are delightful. And personally, Clojure has always felt more natural, even though, I also love the Haskell approach.

One part of the joy that came with using Clojure is that there isn't really any bad choice. For example, I wanted a quick and dirty internal web application for admin purposes. I went with reframe. Why? Because I wanted to try it. And I knew, that I could get things done with it.

This is probably not the easiest "framework" (not sure this is a good name for it) but it was very fun. I think, if I had to progress from just a toy to a really strong, user facing UI, I think it would still be a pretty good choice. If some feature is missing, or something doesn't work as I would have liked, I know it will not be difficult to correct it myself.

I know that this could feel overwhelming, but this is freedom in a world where you expect there exists a single "best practice". As long as the tool is powerful enough it will be fine. On my end, I appreciate the fact there is not a single "web framework" in Clojure. Instead you have tons of libs you can use that work well together because they are all tied with a few common concepts (like ring for example). If you don't like to choose the libs. There are a few people that provide a starter pack with somewhat nice bundle of libs in a single system like pedestal or luminus for only citing two of them.

My recommendation is to not lose too much time looking for the best choice. Most of them will be good.

I am pretty confident the spammers will remove the `+` suffix from your email. And this is why I find the Apple fake email building solution a lot better because they build a fully different email per service. No way for the service to be able to cheat and discover my real email address from the one I give them.

Still a smart enough system might be able to discover a valid email from my other id info, like my name. But this start to be a lot of work, while just `s/+[^@]*@//` is easy enough to do.