yobbobandana
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
China overtook the United States at the end of 2008
to become New Zealand's second largest trading partner,
with bilateral trade amounting to $9.4 billion in the
year ended December 2009.
source: http://www.nzdmo.govt.nz/publications/nzefo/2010/17.htmThe second linked document - New Zealand's submission - was quite readable and seems fairly rational.
The essays by NZ organisations opposing TPP were also pretty much all interesting reads.
As far as i'm aware the current solution for this is still to use Flash, or a native application. I'd be happy to be wrong. In any case making a phone entirely controllable via web standards will ensure that such capabilities are avilable and proven.
If anyone has more info on webcam integration with HTML5 video, this stackoverflow post could use some love: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1318834/whats-the-status-...
http://saladeprensa.telefonica.com/jsp/base.jsp?contenido=/j...
"This is the kind of stuff we do not like, vote for us if you also do not like it."
I think it targets their core demographic quite well. Whether it is mock outrage or not is a moot point.
""The $I cost is the most subjective of the four and depends on how much stock a player puts in "doing the right thing," (so to speak) or whether they even see any moral integrity in the choice at all.""
I agree on the value-added point though, there are often services game makers can provide which make the official copy more attractive to players.
When something is stolen, the original owner no longer has posession of the stolen object. If the story were about money or physical property, "stealing" would be appropriate. It is not.
The word "copying" is quite adequate. In this case, direct copying is obviously poor behaviour. It betrays a lack of capability on the part of the copyer. This story would have had the same emotional impact, had it used the correct term.
Using the word "stealing" mires the story in the intricacies of digital copyright debate, which is not what this is about. It is about a startup not doing its own work, and thus demonstrating inability.
For example to "Develop new models to accurately predict the market response to large trades." is valued at $10,000.