ycreader

oh ok so those are internal tags I though there was a index somewhere to navegate without going all over, thanks

how did you get the #Deltamc in the link?

I don't get what the schur complement is for

"Instead, the measurements match beautifully, largely ruling out some proposals for new particles" from what I understand this is some kind of Occam's razor argument saying that we don't need anything more in the standard model to explain the measurements but is this only qualitatively reasoning or does it actually gives some quantitative constrains to the possibility of new particles? I mean some particles have been predicted before being discovered (the Higgs and neutrinos I have read but there must be more) in those cases have the physicists actually gone and calculated constraints to the possibilities of that particle existing depending on the measurement of the fine structure constant?

Great bio thanks for sharing

Could you elaborate on about why Tomonaga work was more fundamental to QED than Dyson? Thank you

Can you tell me the name of the trick to read about it on wikipedia? thanks

Cwzwarich could you explain further what the Gromov heuristics is about? or where could I read more about it? Thank you

great comment, also something unrelated looking at your website I was hoping to find some notes about how to write in latex I have seen some submissions at HN but I think you could give some awesome tips