Recent submissions

Comment · 9 years ago
Yes. America is stuck in the stone age when it comes to this stuff.
Comment · 9 years ago
> Pichai is beset on all sides by people who expect Google to move mountains, reinvent itself

TIL not showing fake news or having your advertisers associated with ISIS videos is "moving mountains".

Comment · 9 years ago
> Discussing the issue, Pichai deploys the vocabulary of an apologetic CEO that’s become de rigueur in Silicon Valley since last November. He says the word “thoughtful” 13 times and “deeply” (feeling, listening, en

I'm reminded of the BP CEO on South Park. Not that he's actually anything like that guy, it's just what comes to mind.

> Pichai’s solution to the gnawing problems of fake news and illicit content that slip through Google artificial intelligence is, no surprise, more artificial intelligence

Of course it is. What do they say the definition of insanity is again?

> has stirred general alarm about AI; he thinks computers that make their own decisions and are smarter than people could enslave humanity.

at least google isn't saying this.

Comment · 9 years ago
It was an unintended side effect of attempting to use gene augmentation developed for humans, causing a mutation and disease to spread. They developed a cure with help from the crew of the enterprise/phlox but that cure didn't immediately fix the mutations, it took generations.

That's why I called it an accident.

Comment · 9 years ago
I'm not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/everyth...

> A lawsuit challenging the doctrine on First Amendment grounds, Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission , reached the Supreme Court in 1969. The Court ruled unanimously that while broadcasters have First Amendment speech rights, the fact that the spectrum is owned by the government and merely leased to broadcasters gives the FCC the right to regulate news content.

Comment · 9 years ago
The fairness doctrine was not found to be unconstitutional.
Comment · 9 years ago
They have literally had laws enforcing fairness in media.

Fox news is heavily criticized for their biased reporting and editorial standards. That would be the comparison to criticism of HN modding policies.

Comment · 9 years ago
You're argument seems like a strawman. I don't think anyone has argued that HN should operate with no moderation whatsoever.
Comment · 9 years ago
It's still censorship either way.
Comment · 9 years ago
I too prefer my echo chambers to be free of wrong-think.

None of that controversy in my safe space either.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton