yabadabadoes
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
1. Tries to capture all profit from the edges.
2. Extracts value "unreasonably" both to grab what they still can and to create an explanation for the death. This could be high fees, ads, or extraction of market intelligence.
3. Begins embracing the new platform with compatibility layers.
4. Starts making 2 offers on everything. One with their legacy and one with the rising platforms.
5. Treats their nonfounding CEO as significant and someone to listen to.
Plenty of companies make this transition successfully (I chose IBM as the example) and make huge profits from not having to charge uniform prices across the entire market. But the discussion was the windows platform being replaced by Linux, not Microsoft profits.
That is the future of Microsoft and the non-future of Windows.
I'm curious if anyone knows of a table summarizing these products and what their licensing would mean for a laptop you may take to work, etc?
But I do think sending unsolicited emails in this fashion is illegal anyway in many places. I always found their attempt to get around this with a specific sender interesting, but I doubt it is universally legal.
There are a significant number of frauds committed by police (using official resources to stalk, bully, or sell information) and they are caught and prosecuted only when people don't help them bypass things the system can reasonably audit.
They should have just given coins to existing active keybase users. They would have had healthy increase in users based on regret and fear of missing out again.
In this respect a keybase like model makes more sense to me.