xroche
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
> We’re closing coal plants and building wind farms and it all just has to add up in the end. It’s not a one-to-one
And of course this won't cover the loss of energy, so let's pretend we can do that through "energy efficiency"
>You can make up that power by the way you operate the rest of your facilities or having energy efficiency savings so your customers are using less
Tl;Dr for the energy side: Smoke and mirrors.
Or, more generally, don't trust unregulated financial businesses and/or operating in shady offshore countries.
FTX was both unregulated and based in Bahamas.
With a huge process, you have a timeframe between the child is spawned and it executes exec*() where you typically "do stuff" (such as closing a lot of fd)
During this timeframe the parent process has its universe COW'ed, and each write will trigger a page fault.
The performance impact can be concerning in the _parent_ process.
We indeed have a lot of those fancy buildings from famous architects, mostly from the 70s.
They all share a common pattern:
- a repressed artist who became an architect
- a beautiful piece of concrete modern art on the outside and that makes fancy design magazine photos
- an oppressive building and a complete failure in term of comfort/ergonomy
Another example is the "Espaces d'Abraxas". But there are even worse examples when you look at brutalist architecture.
This is why nuclear power plants should be state-sponsored projects. States typically have loans at 0% rate, or even negative interests.
Sure, but basically it means rewriting all structures that rely on a bucket of stuff.
By the way maps often use a large bucket, and rehash in-place can be preferable.
> Which not many do, not unless the allocation is so large as to be in its own dedicated mmap
Do you know a modern operating system that does not have a mremap equivalent ?
On Linux you pretty much use it as soon as you reach large blocks.
I tend to agree, as a C++ developer. There are many core issues in the language that haven't been resolved and that are unacceptable for kernel code.
My personal pet peeve: C++ is unable to reallocate a new[] region. This makes basically all structures (vector, hashmap, trees...) unusable for large data handling.
There is no such thing as storage systems at wide scale unfortunately
> well also run out of fuel within a few generations
Absolutely. But hopefully fusion will be around then.
You can't exit from the oil economy with renewable such as wind or solar due to their non-predictability.
If you want to stop importing Russian gaz, you need nuclear energy.