xqt40

Dude, it is not safe programming if you put all your code under unsafe brackets.

You can write safe code in other languages but it really requires more advanced programmers than Rust programmers will ever be - the idea of Rust is to simply taking out responsibility from all programmers and puts it on Rust developers, so how much you care about code safety - that is not what you need to think when programming in Rust.

>>>I want to make a game myself in Rust one day and I know for certain that my scripting will definitely not be in Rust.

I mean - do I need to say more?

Like I mentioned - belief in Rust is a religion and I got a proof in those negative votes.

I don't think that people like you understand what are appliances for AI - it is not about writing or optimizing code, but writing language from the scrap if needed. And my remark was that Rust will hit the wall where it will need to go fully AI, because developers simply can't fullfill the promise of safe code by default as it would require inhuman testing to even get near that promised result. Also Rust is meant for humans - which loses any edge if switch is happening towards descriptive and not even programming language that developers will use. Rust here simply has no edge at all as any programming language can be improved with memory safety in mind.

Places changing names is not an issue. My ancestors simply moved to a different country so this might be problematical to prove anything based on different country archives. But archives of small villages means nothing - there were central records for appropriate states.

I'm afraid, you would sooner see safe code in assembler with the help of ai than in rust. You can argue that ai can be used to enhance rust, but at this point why bother if ai will be writing code by your instructions.

There are plenty of passion projects that have been successful. So this is not an excuse. I've abandoned rust because I don't find it useable to me with unneeded complexity to code. Also with graphics most of the code was not safe. So believing only took me that far.

No. What you are refering to might be in regards to Uralification, while 50% of Saami undeniably have been indigenous population and were there before Uralics arrived there. And Nordics encroached on lands where even partly Uralized Saami were first. No one is arguing that Saami are indigenous to Oslo, but they were first in 80% of Scandinavia.

I'm kinda baffled what you mean by authorities prior Soviet occupation, as Baltics an Ukraine/Poland have archives and power to acknowledge Jewish ancestry. It was not a question on decision to trust but requirement of the process by Israel for those that wanted to migrate to Israel.

Dude, your passort already have information on the chip that is machine readable. All the data that is being forked over is not on the passport but various databases - Interpol, Europol, etc.

I think that your wording is still horrendous.

One thing is autism that is in genes and other is behavioral/adaptational etc. change.

I can assure you that diet had no impact on my anxiety that I have with my autism, where in stressful situations I have severe communication issues with other people with all rhe "classic autism" symptoms, while in very relaxed environment you will have a hard time to define me as autistic at all - where my adhd(undiagnosed) would crawl out...

What realy upsets is how some autistic people are defining themselves an their place in society. I had less issues wit NT people - almost always the people that tried to impose on me some rules were people with diagnosed/undiagnosed spectrum - the worst damage I have seen to others also have been from autistic people as with NTs you can mirror, but with peolle on spectrum - it is a nightmare.

You are right about that. The company seems to have bad QA process and that is not something that can be improved easily as it requires change in culture and management.

Your suggestion simply shows that you have no understanding of how things work. Terminals already does not allow users to install anything. As for rest of workstations and work laptops - users already don't install anything on them. The issue with Crowdstrike is not with users but with service that is maintaing these computers. A very frightening thing that all those companies are dependant on the f*ck off of their service provider and it costs them all their business.

No viruses need installation - in fact it would be easiest thing if viruses were listed among installed programms. Are yiu representing your whole generation or you are only one such strange person?

Also your suggestion os outdated by at least 60 years as it assumes that hardware that has no software update capabilities can't be hacked...

What does any of SCCM and Intune has to do with Crowdstrike? Intune is already outdated btw.