xixixao

Author explains the demos are real but current setup bulky.

> And we’re introducing a new monthly API credit for our Claude Max and Team subscribers, designed to support our users in building new agents and applications that run on the Claude Platform.

OpenAI really should as this too, even to Plus. I’m already paying more for ChatGPT than I use, give me some free API tokens to play with (there is a free tier for data sharing, but only older text generating models)

It launches on mobile safari but doesn’t seem playable, landscape on mobile safari sucks.

"Topic" is usually covered by branch name. Commit message goes with a set of code changes, it feels more logical to me for the message to describe the actual code as it was written (as it might have changed from the idea phase).

I cannot wait to be past this “here’s a matrix with 40 model options” phase of AI. No “normal” users can tell which choice is optimal for which task.

Example I have worked: Personal delivery app, that tracks packages from various senders using incoming emails.

I am using the single prompt approach with GPT5.4, which is free, but it’s not reliable. Using Jev I’d decompose the prompt into a bunch of smaller questions, then I’d combine the answers in software. I’m super excited to try Jev out.

Tailwind is free. The company’s paid offerings are clearly not useful enough in the world of AI. That’s the crux.

This is such a poor comment. It starts talking about the business model, but it’s just a “Tailwind shouldn’t exist at all” argument. Clearly it’s a useful tool if it’s used by so many people and companies.

You’d have to say which NATO. Czechia is in NATO and was in Warsaw pact.

If you said: Americans usually incorrectly think of Western Europe as those countries not partially or fully under control of the Soviet Union during the Cold War, then I’d agree with you.

Article says Western Europe, but Norway is in Northern Europe.

“First rocket to launch from Europe outside Russia” would have been perfectly correct.

Dumb single sample example: I asked Fable 5.1 to change from hard to soft deletion in an office map backend, and it used soft deletion for data which is synced from another system, but left hard deletion on for the mapping data itself (who sits where). For me it’s a pretty severe lack of judgement (like a red flag if I asked this in an interview).

Very cool!

Note that you can run Convex on top of your own Postgres, and we do this for our internal apps, with very nice performance (plenty for our internal use cases).

In this day and age, where material stuff is so cheap, isn’t 20K for a tiny shed crazy? Clearly it is because it involves so much work, and work is so expensive, but I can’t help but think there should be a technical solution to this. Or buildings are just not automatable? I’m amazed.

People communicate with regards to the audience they expect.

This is why Rust (it’s a systems programming language) and LSP (the language server protocol invented by VS Code) are not explained in the article.

I am hoping I don’t have to define the words I used, but if in doubt, Google or ChatGPT are your friends.

You can do some of this with 1Password as well btw. Looks nice!