x0137294744532

I would and I am sane of mind.

It is sufficient to delete or anonymize identifying information. For instance, in the case of discord, it is possible to delete only the account information without deleting the chat themselves to comply with GDPR. You can still see the chat messages for the account id 123456789, but you shouldn't be able to associate this account id with an email or other personal information.

> why is extrajudicial punishment allowed?

In some cases it is common sense. For instance: a pedophile shouldn't be allowed to be a school teacher.

Maybe the amount of neurons grows as their "usage percentage" reaches a certain threshold, making the memory capacity unlimited.

You are describing the ethnicity, not the race. Race refers only to the skin color of the person, whereas ethnicity refers to the cultural and lineage aspect of that person.

Both are not mutually exclusive and can be stopped independently from one another.

> There is no text which codifies it, unlike Islam.

Each sect has a different Quran, different Sharia, different precepts. There are massive differences in the way Islam is practiced across the world.

> Unlike religion, its not voluntary.

Imagine then someone who openly claims to be an artist and that creating art is a part of them. Would you say this person culturally associate with a murderer who kills "for art"? Both call themselves and associate with the artistic work.

> I would say a better analogy would be a white man associating himself with black gang culture by getting gold teeth, gold chains, tattoos,etc to a job.

I don't think that it is a good analogy, as that white man associate concretely to black gang culture.

A better analogy would be, a man who associate with black culture in general but gets rejected because his employer consider him to associate with black gang culture although he claims he doesn't.

> Hindus dont have religious literature (and Hindu countries dont have laws) against other religious.

But hindus have the same culture. Going by your logic, every hindu culturally associate with the other hindus.

> but yes, I guess you do culturally associate with all churches if you are openly Christian and wear a cross at work,etc.

Then let me give you a more extreme implication of this logic:

By calling ourself openly human beings, we culturally associate with every other evil man since they are also human beings. Therefore, we are no better than the most evil man on earth.

> He voluntarily associates and culturally identifies with a group of people who are culturally incompatible with the country (Sharia, triple talaq,festivals which involve cutting goats on the road,etc) and are a threat to national security (a lot of terrorist attacks are after all funded by Muslim countries).

According to this logic, by being a conservative american protestant, you culturally associate with westboro baptist church. Also, by being a strong believing hindu, you obviously culturally associate yourself with the massacre of muslims, and vice versa.

This doesn't make sense.

If one can not afford to pay a living wage for these jobs, then these jobs should not have existed in the first place.

According to a poll from Kantor Public onepoint/TF1, of the people who voted Macron, 36% voted to support Macron and 64% voted to prevent Le Pen.

It is safe to say that the conservatives and leftists are more anti-Le Pen than pro-Macron, and they represent about 40% of the population according to the first round of the election.

Considering that Le Pen gained only a few extra votes compared to the first round, it can be said that about 2/3 of Macron's supporters in the second round are not pro-Macron but in fact anti-Le Pen.