wwww4all

Democrats had filibuster proof senators when Obama was president. They had way more than 50%.

Why did this not happen then?

The president can simply order IRS to give taxpayers itemized list of taxes and income information they have and the taxes for the year.

If the taxpayer agrees, they can just sign and get refund or pay additional taxes.

If taxpayer disagrees, they can submit additional information.

The Democratic president can do this right now, for this tax year.

Democrats have the entire government now, President, senate and the house. Democrats had filibuster proof majority when Obama was president.

Why are you just blaming Republicans?

Google hired these researchers to give them some basic facade of having concerns about AI ethics. They were supposed to write some nonsense papers and just act as shields when questions about AI ethics were raised.

When these people bit Google on the hand, Google got rid of them. Simple story.

Google is a monopoly and needs to be broken up under anti trust rules.

Speaking as a senior software engineer, where I develop software to bring food to my table, Amazon is a monopoly and should be broken up under anti trust rules.

Amazon as a business is about rent seeking and taxing internet commerce and engages in predatory monopoly behavior. They are actively suppressing tech competition and free market activity in e-commerce space.

The Amazon workers union should expand to cover he entire country.

Anyone that thinks this is about free market and Amazon is just a private company doesn’t have a clue. Amazon is quasi government actor now, where they are the only game in some small company towns. Jeff Bezos owns Washington Post and exerts undue influence on many politicians. Amazon has contracts with CIA and military.

As a software engineer, do you want a future where Amazon is the only employer and can undercut the salary to their liking?

Basically, the legacy establishment media is complaining about the new establishment social media.

Same thing as the the obsolete horse and buggy industry complaining about the automobiles taking up all the street space and causing traffic.

The establishment media got big, fat and lazy with their monopoly and selling limited ad space.

When the ads space became infinite in the web, they didn’t innovate and pivot to web technologies.

Google and Facebook innovated web technologies and leveraged their tools to filter and target valuable audience attention space.

The establishment media is obsolete and no amount of complaining is going to change the dynamic of the web. All they can do is talk about their high school glory days of scoring 5 touchdowns in high school championship game.

It’s easy to be armchair sql injection expert and point fingers.

I can guarantee that any system that you’ve worked on has numerous OWASP security bugs. You’ve probably looked at the bugs countless times and never noticed it.

Every software engineer of all levels has overlooked obvious sql injection bugs in their code base. Most likely you’ve added to the bug list.

Software bugs are simple part of any development effort. All major companies, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, etc. has very simple bugs like this in their systems.

That’s why they pay out bug bounties, it’s cheaper for them to add the bug and have some random security researcher find the bugs for them.

Go ahead and try to implement a fix to sql injection bug in any of your systems. I can guarantee there’s a sql injection issue somewhere.

The reason it’s so prevalent is because it’s not a rookie issue and very difficult to fix properly, without impacting significant changes.

That’s why OWASP has it as huge part of security analysis and resolution.

Look up gell-mann amnesia effect. The article doesn’t know much about OWASP practices.

SQL injection bugs are not rookie mistakes, it’s prevalent in many current and future applications. Look into Vtech sql injection hack, a large company with lots of resources had similar bug.

Look at previous hacks, solar winds hack, Sony hack, were all preventable common hacks.

Olympics added beach volleyball because they needed ratings and advertisers.

Curling was added because it’s ok winter sport that draw enough viewers and advertisers.

Science is about describing reality. You may be describing scientism, or some other psuedo scientific charade, which conflates actual science with hand waving mumbo jumbo, like people try to conflate astro physics with astrology.

Gold has always existed, as far as we know. People have known about gold and it’s properties, long before classic science described gold. There’s no model or testing hypothesis for gold needed. Gold exists because people use them regularly.

Science just described gold and other elements, because they exist in reality.

Engineers and people didnt need science to describe gold to use gold. Science is convenient way to describe reality for what it is.

Typescript is more popular now because projects are migrating more and more business logic layer to front end. Thus the need for type safety and static analysis.

I’m agnostic about Typescript. Bare JavaScript is very efficient and optimized language, well suited for smaller projects.

However, when project scope balloons up, then Typescript becomes more useful. It’s way of enforcing descriptive comments a code, than trying to be a type safe language.

Which people are using it inappropriately and corrupting it?

Why are they doing it? Why are they using silly phrases like, trust the science? Which is basically the same thing religious people do, when they say have faith.

Also, science, the classical definition, has no meaning on its own. It’s simply way to describe reality. It’s usually up to engineers and people to put into practice.

The science may describe gravity, although they still can’t answer why the gravitational constant is a constant.

But, engineers and people can test effects of gravity everyday, and act accordingly.

Science is politicized by the establishment elites to further their narratives. It doesn’t matter what the science says or is even true or not.

Science is just euphemism to hide their agenda and further their goals.