workingpatrick
Joined 8 years ago
Joined 8 years ago
FTFY
It's a bunch of work and time and effort to reverse engineer it just to get back to the point of still having a piece of shit legacy system.
Honestly this is effectively natural selection at play for businesses. They put themselves in this situation, if it dies and destroys the business ... good fucking riddance, the people who let this situation occur need to fail hard, it's the only way they will ever learn.
Just walk up to the machine and plug in a USB kill for 2 seconds, remove it, and get on with your life.
So that automates their work if you assign it to them manually.
The self-starter training seems to take effect when you've not manually assigned a task to them. They will search for a single task to complete X times in a row, with a slight delay between each task, where X is equal to their "Self-Starter Training" level.
When their tasks are started automatically via this skill, the "Observation training" seems to be ignored.
Do you have any assurances that what you've been told, regarding independence will remain true? If so, are those assurances any more concrete than the initial promise of independence?
Not trying to be negative, but telling a company that's been acquired that things will stay the same, seems to be one of the oldest corporate lies in the book.
Thoughts? Thanks for your post.