wonko1
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
I guess there are probably no surveys of this though...
This is one more thing pushing me in that direction.
To be honest, I don't think it so much of an issue any more. I have a library of parts I use regularly and just design footprints for new parts.
I'm my case, I doubt that Altium would have footprints for many of the parts I want to use anyway (quite often cheap connectors, switches etc). I feel like being comfortable with footprint design is an important part of the design process.
That said, there are many features of Altium that look very attractive. For example the push and shove routing.
I also recommend the excellent "getting to blinky" videos:
https://contextualelectronics.com/learning/getting-to-blinky...
Which teach the basics of Kicad too.
I think I've seen this before in an HPC context. But they've build a firmware distribution called Heads. It boots using coreboot then fires up a Linux kernel from flash.
The kernel is then used as a second stage bootloader. It takes about 2 seconds to get Linux booted from flash.
They can then boot the system OS, optionally using kexec to smoothly transition to the system kernel.
Very neat! Along the way they've also done other important work, like put together a minimal firmware for the Management engine (a second CPU in Intel system with its own OS, and many many issues).
The biggest problem here is same issue that coreboot has. Coreboot support is really limited. I think it down supports Lenovo X220s, but late time I looked not much modern hardware.
I tried search for me info, but could find anything. Was this the default? Procedure given in a popular tutorial? It seems pretty insane.
When my daughter pours water in the keyboard I just get a new one and don't have to care too much.
I guess he got lucky, but as a parent I worry about this. He points out that most educational establishments don't encourage individual exploration, and that was my experience too.
Makes me consider home schooling, but that seems like a less than ideal solution too. Do we just have to rely on luck?
They cost on the order of 100USD for the cheapest models. The cheapest Wifi "IoT" microcontrollers are on the order of 1USD.
Seems like it might be a reasonable business move, even if it's just a box ticking exercise.
I'll be surprised if they do put them in their lowest end products though. Perhaps those product lines are stable and won't be updated in 2017?