wonder_er
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
"milk" is a cow eating soy and grain, intended for a baby cow, but it's mostly made out of the same plant that the cow ate.
"meat" is cooked animal muscle that has been built more slowly than milk, but is also built out of the plants ingested by that baby animal.
virtually all 'meat' is made out of animals that could be easily considered to be babies of that kind of animal. :(
anyway, that doing bad things like this is bad for everyone who does it is not surprising.
Something about strava and the data we get from it is really special to me. It's a fun step into a deeply physical thing (moving our selves around the surface of the earth) and renders it in this digital space - a website, an animation.
I'm literally trying to fix broken junctions around me.
It's at the same time laughably easy, and wildly complicated.
I'm calling the alternative, correct junction a 'traffic bean':
https://josh.works/traffic-bean
It's relevant to software, sorta. I've got rather a lot of GIS/mobility-related data available here. It's just a rails app that renders a bunch of my strava activity data all at once: https://josh.works/mobility-data
The fixes are entirely accomplishable with nothing more high-tech than traffic cones. They can be upgraded to more permanent and pretty physical objects, but the key bit of the traffic bean finds traffic cones fully sufficient. No half-million USD traffic signals, no red/green/yellow light cycles. continuous flow. safety. peace.
Some stuff that's obvious in some domains, like "at high-throughput times, don't allow key bits of infrastructure be completely unusable".
Bringing this to american municipalities is like trying to speak a language with someone that doesn't speak your language, but demands that you treat them as if they do.
it's been a big, long-running project. Most tradition in the USA is really a fig leaf for supremacy, and people can smell that I'm coming for their supremacy a mile away, and they immediately begin deploying emotional defenses.
Or so it seems.
It sounds like you think I use more self-citation than you would expect, for someone writing only for themselves.
Are you saying I'm wrong about police originating as deputized slave patrollers?
I suppose I'd refine my statement from "political authority is not real" to "political authority _is not legitimate_."
That someone holding the fantasy of political authority is willing to murder someone else because of that fantasy doesn't make political authority legitimate, though it's obviously 'real' from the POV of the oppressor/victim.
My first claim was that 'jaywalking' is a propagandist term that actively harms every subsequent part of the conversation. It's a slur ('jay'), and supports a narrative supporting, basically, vehicular homicide.
I don't find most people in the USA to be worth taking seriously, either. Liiiike if someone thinks the primary purpose of police is something like "protecting and serving" vs. being deputized slave patrollers.
How could I take that person seriously?
If I don't think political authority is real, and 90% of the us population does think it is real, and votes, I'm already out of sync with all of those people.
And I've got at least one or two additional hot takes that could alienate another few percentage points.
race and gender are constructs of supremacy thinking, the US government commits 100x more acts of terrorism than the next most terroristic group, evangelicalism is a cult, all religion is self-and-other harming, monogamy is way over-rated, marriage is harmful to everyone...
honestly, I'd be concerned if it seemed like lots of people agreed with me, especially lots of people in America! One doesn't get a nation that did 400+ years of chattel slavery without most people being pro-slavery.
I think it's the latter.
Indeed, the junction can be a bit unfamiliar, and it looks like the one in Bodmin could be less confusing - I think delinieating the inner space and keeping cars to the edges (to make it more of an actual roundabout) would improve things for everyone.
Maybe I should call it a 'traffic doughnut' to highlight the difference between the inner/outer space of the junction.
American road networks were designed to be impervious to the opinions of everyone who uses them, so I'm very pleased with myself to have gotten so close to the permission I need to do a novel junction design.
If you can do UK-style traffic circles, you'd be fine on this junction.
My proposal to to shape down all inbound lanes of traffic to a single lane, then connect them all to the inner circulating channel - it's a little lumpy, thus 'bean shaped' instead of 'circle shaped'.
But as far as using it, from the POV of the driver of a vehicle, it's identical to a roundabout.
A normal ethical system would say the obligation to not kill anyone with a vehicle is on the operator of the vehicle. The environment should also support safe handoffs between priorities.
The parents are not at fault - they were born into this shitty country. It is the road engineer, the city engineer, full stop.
Consider this book: [Killed by a Traffic Engineer: Shattering the Delusion that Science Underlies our Transportation System](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/201978334-killed-by-a-tr...)
Jaywalking is a supremacists, propagandistic term, I would propose it be excised from your vocabulary: https://josh.works/jaywalking
It was used mostly to imprison formerly enslaved people for walking around. In some american cities in the 50s and 60s, thousands of people PER YEAR were ARRESTED for jaywalking!!!!
It's how deputized slave patrols (police) can easily initiate harassment against the enslaved/formerly-enslaved class.
There's a house near here that was written about in an article - it's at the end of a long straight road, and then there's a curve, and often-enough people go way too fast on the road, don't catch the curve, bounce through a bunch of grassy median and end up HITTING THIS HOUSE!
It's been hit so many times.
so, I really like bollards (https://josh.works/bollards) and I went to his house to see about adding some. He'd already had large rocks (1000lbs) placed in his yard, and after the most recent car hit them (and bounced one of them into his house) he added some 3000 lb rocks. It's still not a full layer of protection, but it's better.
Anyway, the real danger is the junction, not him having good enough or not good enough bollards. So, there was a meeting at his house the next day with city traffic engineering staff, police, city council, lots of neighbors...
and I'm popularizing a fix that I'm calling 'the traffic bean' - it's a shared-space junction, that is as effective as the existing junction, and much, much safer:
https://josh.works/traffic-bean
The director of Denver's DOTI has been looking it over, as a city council person has been pushing for it to get approved, and it might get approved! This would be basically the first real improvement in how american junctions are designed in decades.
It's currently just my side-project wish. All I want is to live near and use a road network that doesn't deal death constantly to others.
i fear for my kid's life, the same way these kids lives were affected. American road networks are horrific, I cannot take seriously anyone who takes them seriously.
I currently 'go hard' on tiktok, because I've recently been collecting tons of footage of mobility networks via drone and 360 camera (mostly while I ride my scooter/small motorcycle around)
the tiktok editor is pretty good for that purpose, and then I bring some clips back to my blog.
For instance, https://josh.works/traffic-bean has text, links to some substacks I wrote, a youtube video embed (drone footage) and tiktok embeds (insta360 footage).
It does the trick.
But everything that isn't on my website I count as ephemeral, discard, creative detritus that I create lots of so I can occasionally get the good bits.
I love having my website. I can write whatever I want. I can write about grief, or supremacy, or ruby, or american road networks, and I have a list of subscribers (~300) via email that I can talk to directly.
I love to see other people's blogs. It's so much more interesting to me than an instagram or tik tok or whatever.
:)
(Purchased sorta 'just for fun', to evaluate my own metabolic responsiveness. I wrote about it once: [0])
if I moved around much after eating, my muscles would "soak" lots of glucose from my blood and the insulin change would be relatively low. If it was something sugary and I then went to sleep, it would be a big slow rise for a few hours of blood sugar, then insulin would seem to be released, and it would decline a bit, then flatten, then decline, until it went back to a regular level. When waking up, it would often by around 70 mg/DL, and even if I eat zero carbs (or am full-on fasting!) it would bounce up/around during the day. I appreciated that my body seemed quite capable of doing whatever it needed to do to raise my blood glucose levels. (They always go up when exercising, for instance, even if no food is consumed)
I think everyone would likely find the data interesting, it's so freaky customized to yourself, it cannot help but be interesting. They're expensive, so I think buying even one sensor and wearing it for 2 weeks or however long is worth it.
Lower the center of gravity, reduce the weight, increase the wind protection, make the riding stance really comfortable.
Make it easily accommodate a backpack, or a passenger, or both.
And you have a scooter!
They're unconventional in the greater usa, but wildly fun.
Generally, it seems like one can entertain the best parts of a bicycle, feet, and a car, and a motorcycle, all in one.
I wrote a bit of an ode to scooters, here: https://josh.works/scootering
I wish more of my friends rode scooters!