wohoef
Joined 1 year ago
Karma
111
Submissions
28
Member since
Apr 27
Joined 1 year ago
I'm wondering if 2. was added simply to justify them not cooperating. It's a lot easier to defend 1. + 2. than just 1. If in the future they do decide to cooperate with the DoW, they could settle on doing only mass surveillance, but no autonomous killings. This would be presented as a victory for both parties since they both partially get what they wanted, even though autonomous killing was never really on the table for either of them. Which is a big if given the current administration.
Sure snus is better than smoking, but that’s just because most things are better than smoking.
Or do you mean to say that you are trying to find the specific bias each model has?
Where are the friction points for you?