wilg

He is obviously correct about the specific narrow statement made here and it’s so annoying everyone has to be memey mad about it like a bad reddit thread.

The models are really dumb, mainly.

I did not enjoy that there was no way for it to clean up the 18GB of models it installed after I determined it was not really usable for any real work.

In my opinion its okay for them to work on science and math problems and release the results.

They always have video, but audio until theres some kind of emergency situation and they call you.

This also makes it a lot nicer to take a call or FaceTime.

The problem is you burn that gas and put carbon into the atmosphere which warms the planet.

It did work! The point is they did a terrible job of producing the event and being clear what they were talking about and showing the product. The product, for all four people who will be able to buy it ("invite only"), seems very cool. But that is not what I was commenting on!

It was not fine.

Yes: with Siri AI when I say "Siri, good evening" it says "Good evening!" instead of setting my "Good Evening" Apple Home scene which is what it previously did. (This is a suggested scene name in Apple Home.)

> Doctors are the best example of this. They have regulatory agencies that ensure the supply of doctors is always kept artificially low hence why there always appears to be a shortage of doctor while at the same time med school has a very high barrier to entry, it's all by design.

This is like, really bad for society though?

I think attempting few-shot agentic ports of an app as an exercise and having the results not be perfect is really a referendum on thinking or using AI in coding in any particularly meaningful way.

Quite simply because you are allowed to set up international organizations by treaty.

Because nobody is being seriously coerced or forced!