whywhywhywhy
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
One too complex with tolerances so tight manufacturing inconsistency or dirt can be catastrophic the other too heavy for purpose and the translucency unneeded on an enclosed vr headset. But if you talk to product design people both are things that look great on a resume.
Ultimately the team behind it doesn't want to relinquish control to the user, so we're stuck in this world where it can never truly by a professional tool because every step of the way there is something like this where on a real computer its just an extra screen and you put on what you want on it and the situation where content of the other screen gets suddenly shown can't happen. But the iPad has to pretend screens don't exist and only apps do.
Really feels like this thing was designed to be a "robot" as in it rotates to face you etc, but they realized no one was gonna pay $1K for it so ditched that part.
“Other than copy and paste”
Is like saying “other than the most used shortcuts ever”
Feels much better on MacOS where you have ctrl for things within the terminal and cmd for things at an OS/window level.
Would only show worm behavior if machines within the tailnet had the right settings and also were members of other tailnets with those settings but then it would require someone in that tailnet to have another tailnet with the right settings…
It’s far fetched.