whiteopinions

Because I like the username. What's wrong with it?

>Why a new account?

Because I wanted the username.

What are you inquisitive about?

>Strict moderation

I don't consider the moderation on this site to be strict at all?

It's tone police more than it is content police. HN continually lets comments and statements go completely unquestioned, and in some cases actively supports view points, that are objectively wrong in the most vanilla fashion all because it was said in the correct manner.

Why do you think this? Almost every top comment was critical of cloudflare's response for a variety of reasons.

You know what's actually incredibly easy if you have a programming background?

Consolidating versions of jQuery.

>If I'm the next developer I would thank him.

For what? You wouldn't know anything about the previous site implementation

No one said they were silver bullets. No one.

This sounds like you wrote something extremely limited. The client will inevitably ask for some modification to it, and if you're not there to do it the next developer is going to curse at you for writing such a brain dead application.

I've seen comments like this on HN and then I've seen these types of applications in the wild. I call it the most dishonest form of consulting you can do. You've put a real shine on some inflexible shit and the clients obviously have no way of knowing what they've bought into.

>It replaced a site that was a mess of javascript libraries on top of frameworks on top of a half dozen jquery version and on and on and on.

These people are incapable of correctly evaluating work they contract out, or who is doing it. Why do you think you're an exception in this case?

...this was said in reference to being able to use the powers of legislature to serve the greater good despite private interests.

It means the exact opposite of what you think it means.