whattheheckheck

Its all about checks and balances -dario

A spec should use orthodox tools and formats for higher level system descriptions. Like a BPMN file, a TLA+ state machine model, a P/ModP or Event B system.

Llms compile that into a binary and you deploy it and present it and users use it and they're happy or not.

There's just so many different projections of how to describe a system. What's the moat bang for the buck.

It could if people actually used their political power

And get some hallucinated slop infotainment?

Same to you bud

Is this really as interpetable math is fundamentally. Like wtf is this accessibility? who is this for? Do top mathematicians read this like a chapter book? Absolutely ridiculous they have all this compute and creative resources and cant make something more intuitive to help people understand it more natively

One has a human behind it and one has a matrix latent space. Usually human understanding is more "real"

Stallman vehemently states llms are bullshit generators with no true understanding.

But sometimes you can approximate your problem and unfold an llm interlocator to producing the strings you need for your task

Just make a theoretical minimum type test like the landau physicist

The images take up a lot of mobile screen space with low information

Blockchain making a come back

Suburbs take too much and yield too little tax dollars

Countries without class based heirarchy entrenched into the legal system? Where

Did you know MS Copilot can now be driven by Github Copilot Harness?

People with money will have questions and people or machines will need to give answers to satisfy them.

Is anything not a waste of time