wes-k
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
> The main difference between the two experiments was that dogs in study 1 showed a general bias toward looking at the spiky shapes. That bias disappeared in study 2, when their owners were wearing headphones.
... so, they accounted for it, and the control group (group wearing headphones) showed no significance in the dog's behavior. Seems like a huge claim when their control group to rule out the hans effect failed.
As a software engineer I have been strict on making sure my code is elegant.
Vibe coding has switched me to product (and project) manager. Why would I care about what the code looks like? Does it work!? Does it do what I want? Does the app have the right UI and UX? These are my concerns now. I rarely look at the output code.
Reminds me of SFCave and Nanana Crash for the simplicity and surprising replay ability.
https://megami.starcreator.com/nanaca-crash/
(Failing to find an online version of SFCave a.t.m :'()
Love this! Be it design specs or a mock from the designer. So many unaccounted for decisions. Good devs will solve many on their own, uplevel when needed, and provide options.
And absolutely it means more design up front. And without human in the direct loop, maybe people won’t skimp on this!
If I don't hear back from you by lunchtime, I WILL eat your leftovers.
meet.hn/city/us-Culver-City