warrantisall

Have you tried to challenge Google's anti-competitive requirements in any way? Would make a case in EU.

I don't get why people accept that kind of intrusion into their own device commonly known as BYOD. If a smartphone is necessary to carry out work duties, let the employer provide one.

How do you see the not so distant future when the vast majority of banking and gov apps would require an integrity level higher thar BASIC_INTEGRITY? Which alternatives would you suggest to GrapheneOS users? A second device, perhaps?

> Banks increasingly limit features such as sending transfers or depositing cheques to their iOS and Android apps.

Not only these features. Viewing PIN, enabling bank cards for internet purchases, enabling/disabling cards.

Revolut isn't among them.

I use ProfiMail on Android. Loving the app since Symbian era. K9Mail is ok too.

Now that you have "money, legal representation and other resources to protect ourselves", will you take legal action against Google's anti-competitive practices?

Not going to work in EU.

How about having full access to /data? Or full system backups GrapheneOS still lacks? One might object granting root access to apps, but the device owner should at least have full FS access via adb.

Pixels are not as close repairable as Fairphones.

Chat Control and age verification belong there.